-
Website
http://politicalwire.com/ -
Original page
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/07/04/palins_huge_gamble.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
MaicoMark
1981 comments · 2573 points
-
FastMovingCloud
1556 comments · 1899 points
-
Dolmance
1343 comments · 1442 points
-
ThatOneDemocrat
1689 comments · 1302 points
-
Tyke
1274 comments · 1099 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2% -- Political Wire
19 hours ago · 61 comments
-
Tipping Point? -- Political Wire
16 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Fox News Off Limits -- Political Wire
15 hours ago · 40 comments
-
Health Care Vote May Slip -- Political Wire
13 hours ago · 32 comments
-
NY-23 Still a Toss Up -- Political Wire
12 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2% -- Political Wire
Yesterday she gave Alaska the middle finger as she spring-boarded off of them in order to jump into something more lucrative for her and her family. .
You're only a lame duck when you are term limited or you announce that you are not running for re-election. She could have chosen not to make her re-election plans --public knowledge-- until maybe 10 months from now. At least she could have accomplished something in those 10 months before her term expired or she resigned. As it stands now she is leaving her job after 28 months- 3 of which she spent campaigning with McCain and this isnt counting the time she spent after the election giving speeches and campaigning for that Georgia senate run-off race in December.
Resigning now has no integrity to it. At least Clinton and Bush both had completed a full term as governor (Clinton had completed 4 terms) before they gave up their governorships to run for president.
Even after the press conference yesterday we still dont have a reason as to why she quit. She didnt really give one in her rambling, anti-media, rant. She's a joke.
I think that's a HUGE assumption. It's simply a terrible idea, even correcting for the fact that Palin generally has lousy political instincts.
It's pretty simple. Sitting office holders catch much more flak for violations than former ones. It saves them from the embarrassment of calls for resignation, and also since a lot of these processes are to save the public from the crazy thing she is being in office, some of these processes will slow down or stop.
doesn't want to be a sitting governor when the truth breaks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEQdYdCfl60
Next week she'll be an American eagle (but one with nice hair, not the bald kind), a dust mite, a proud lioness with big pointy teeth, a roseate spoonbill, a palm civet, an amphioxus, and a seventeen-year cicada.
Animal crackers in my soup
Monkeys and rabbits loop the loop
Gosh oh gee but I have fun
Swallowing animals one by one
In every bowl of soup I see
Lions and Tigers watching me
I make 'em jump right through a hoop
Those animal crackers in my soup
When I get hold of the big bad wolf
I just push him under to drown
Then I bite him in a million bits
And I gobble him right down
I'll eat the plants and the fruit from the trees,
And I'll live on vegetables and I'll grow on seeds,
But I don't eat animals and they don't eat me,
Oh no, I don't eat animals 'cause I love them, you see,
I don't eat animals, I want nothing dead in me." - Melanie Safka
I'm living proof that you can be a fat vegetarian. It takes dedication, perseverance, and a lot of planning, but you can eschew meat, fish, and shellfish and still qualify for your own zip code.
(to be pronounced "car-NIV-uh-ree" in the Bob and Ray manner)
"I believe it was F. Scott Fitzgerald who wrote, "When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in the flag carrying a cross...we will have fascism with a happy face."
Isn't this the 'new' republican party of Ms. Palin?
[edited to correct typo]
I would like to give Ms. Palin a little history lesson...
Former Vice-Presidential Nominees who tried for their Party's Presidential nominations:
George Hunt Pendleton, the 1864 running mate of George McClellan, lost the 1868 Democratic Presidential nomination.
Charles Francis Adams, the 1848 Free-Soil running-mate of Martin Van Buren, lost the 1872 Liberal Republican Presidential nomination.
Hiram Johnson, the 1912 Progressive Party running-mate of Theodore Roosevelt, lost the 1924 Republican Presidential nomination
Earl Warren, the 1948 running-mate of Thomas E. Dewey, lost the 1952 Republican Presidential nomination
Henry Cabot Lodge, the 1960 running-mate of Richard M. Nixon, lost the 1964 Republican Presidential nomination.
Edmund Sixtus Muskie, the 1968 running-mate of Hubert H. Humphrey, lost the 1972 Democratic Presidential nomination
R. Sargent Shriver, the 1972 running-mate of Geroge S. McGovern, lost the 1976 Democratic Presidential nomination
Jack Kemp, the 1996 running-mate of Robert J. Dole, lost the 2000 Republican Presidential nomination
Joseph T. Lieberman, the 2000 running-mate of Albert A. Gore, Jr., lost the 2004 Democratic Presidential nomination
John Edwards, the 2004 running-mate of John Kerry, lost the 2008 Democratic Presidential nomination.
Former Vice-Presidential nominees who lost Presidential elections:
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, who ran for Vice-President in 1800, lost the 1804 and 1808 Presidential elections
Rufus King, who ran for Vice-President in 1804 and 1808, lost the 1816 Presidential election.
Robert J. Dole, the 1976 running-mate of Gerald R. Ford, lost the 1996 Presidential election.
Former Vice-Presidential nominee who later was elected President:
Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 1920 running-mate of James M. Cox, was elected President in 1932.
So, as Ms. Palin may think that she has a clear shot at not only the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination, but, also the Presidential election, thankfully, history is not on her side,
as you can clearly see by these statistics.
I would suggest that Ms. Palin take her, now tarnished, beauty pageant crown and slip off the national stage.
Roosevelt had polio, couldn't walk, was living in the worst economic times this nation has ever seen - but he didn't walk out on his obligations to the people who elected him.
than Sarah Palin ever will. Which is probably a good thing!
Her speech on July 3rd was incoherent. She didn't make any sense. She was constantly contradicting herself. ("I love my job" to making a bigger difference outside of being governor for Alaska)
She reminds me of a 16 year old girl trying to break up with her boyfriend. She is trying to sugar coat the break up, but can't explain why she is doing it, she just rambles.
Palin would just give him the biggest landslide in American history.
Trouble is, the GOP has already figured that out.
;)
Besides, it's obvious that most of what 367 has posted over the past few months is based on his fantasies about her, nothing about reality. I've come to doubt anything he claims (married and a lawyer). More likely he's one of those pathetic losers with no life and a lot of keyboard courage. No other explanation fits his pathological devotion. He's officially at the "creepy stalker" stage.
(hey, that rhymes!)
Today, I'm saying his odds are 55-45. If he increases the tax burden, his odds diminish. If we get hit, he's toast. Everyone knows this also.
So what is confusing? Months ago Palin decided on one term. (Clue book deal. A gaudy embarrassment of riches for the average AK voter. She'd have waited if local politics were her primary motivators.)
She will not know exactly what she would be doing after 2010 because she would have to see how beatable Obama could be. She does not really care about being President as much as one would think. She'll make up her mind next year depending on what the economy looks like. So it's timing. There is only two factors.
I was a proponent of her running for reelection until I watched how weird Alaska politics can be. In Pennsylvania, she's never have these problems. She's and her family have been laboring under an onslaught of personal economic assaults because her state's new ethic laws are flawed. They invite abuses that cannot legally be rectified. The process had degenerated into suing her for having political opinions. Good tactic? If you want to drive people of limited means out office, then Alaska has the model Code for you.
She's not that wealthy. She and her husband had a net worth of $1.2 million before the crash and before her book deal. She has legal bills of $600,000. Had she stayed in office those bills would only mount. What sense would it make to have a pac and a book deal that you can use to advance what you believe in only to have to pay legal bills?
So she cuts her losses sooner rather than later. This gives her more time to improve herself as a national politician in an infinite number of ways. She can hump the book and grow Sarahpac.
It also helps to give her successor badly needed time as an incumbent. Big Oil still controls a lot, including those Republican politicians who oppose her in Alaska. Parnell is the best bet for her policies to continue. Otherwise, Big Oil undoes the pipeline, etc.
The down side is that she gets labeled a quitter. You saw her response already. Mitt Romney can be accused of running for president the last couple of years he held office. She has calculated that she'll run the risk of being called a quitter. Big deal she gets clobbered for whatever she does anyway.
Her decision to try to be the first female President is still based on the same equation.
Not that you're hoping for that. Of course. :[
ANY President would see a huge uptick in public support after a major terrorist attack.
Obama would handle it far better than Bush.
And let's just be grateful we'll never know how Palin would handle it.
Because she's out.
The smart move for her would have been to keep as low a profile as possible, serve out her term as governor, and wait for her GOP rivals to make mistakes--Sanford just took himself out of the running. And apparently, she felt upstaged by this. :\
The smart one is Huckabee, so far. He's the only one not making any mistakes. Pawlenty would be the toughest opponent for Obama in the general, but Huckabee is the one making all the right moves. He wouldn't raise nearly as much money as Palin--for Obama.
;)
When she first came out in your convention. I was ready to give it up to your party. I thought she was a winner. It only took one interview for me to realize she was not qualified for vice president. This woman in all her speeches talked reckless and dangerous. She did not include all the country, she divided us up into what she called "the real Americans & the terrorist." Your party supported this kind of talk and it has put your party OUT. Your party will not come back until you can stop this slaughter of the constitution. Yet, you continue to have people like R.L. & A.C. doing this over and over. Not only is your party doing this , but for once, people understand what you mean about "smaller government." Your idea for smaller government is to have big corporations running the country. The government is for the people and by the people,when you realize this ...just maybe something will happen, for you. I really don't think you republicans will ever learn this lesson. Your party has made people hate you ways, not you as a person, but it gets where we can't stand you. I guess it's because you never learn.
Except now it's a fraction of one term.
"She does not really care about being President as much as one would think. She'll make up her mind next year depending on what the economy looks like."
And that's assuming that it's possible to predict what's going inside that head of hers. This announcement took everybody by surprise, even her close aides. So, 36763, how do you know what Sarah is planning? Do have some information nobody else is privy to?
"The down side is that she gets labeled a quitter."
Yes, and that is a huge downside. In fact, it's so huge that it means her political career is essentially over. She had a choice: the money or the career. She made her choice. And that's fine by me. But please, please, stop the whining about how unfair it is for her. An astute politician usually manages to navigate the roadblocks, whatever they happen to be. The fact that poor old Sarah can't speaks volumes about her fitness for office.
I'm still flabbergasted that yesterday you compared Palin to Washington, Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower. Said they were all quitters. Those great Americans were NOT quitters. They all faced adversity, made personal sacrifices, and yes, were criticized by their contemporaries. But they got the job done, and we're better off as a nation for it. Palin is not in the same league, and I am astounded that anyone would try to make the comparison.
Imaginary pillow talk, I'd wager.
All in all, Palin has proven herself to be a foolish, unprepared celebrity. She has no value outside the look good and wink sphere.
In your own words 36763 you have the kernel of Sarah's failing. Here she has the perfect dragon to slay, a dragon which any credible candidate for POTUS must have slain at some time in their ascent to the doorstep of POTUS. A more perfect scene could not have been set for her. Big Oil. Her responsibility and the reward following its completion was the fruit of national credibility. She was the one who energized the debate on the pipeline but would not deign to carry it through. Her failure was someone else's (MSM) fault she says.
You say that "Parnell is the best bet for her policies to continue" but Sarah Palin was that one. She initiated it, it was her self chosen game, but she aborted the play. The failure is obvious. If she could not follow through on her actions how could she handle the larger problems of the world stage like N. Korea, or China or Iran or even some brushfire war somewhere? Who would have confidence in someone who has accomplished little beyond being a mother and surfing the waves of constant contention?
There is a momentum any Governor would acquire upon assuming office and good faith would give that Governor time to carry out the necessary things like budget etc. but here we have the graphic example of the Peter Principle wherein the manager rises to the level or his or her incompetence, writ large.
Palin can never appeal to more than 35% of the voters and there is no way if we are in crisis mode the country would entrust our problems to this lightweight.
Shoot Endangered Animals Baby Shoot?
Spy Baby Spy?
Rich-Tax Breaks Baby Rich-Tax Breaks?
TEA Baby TEA >>
Invade Baby Invade?
http://quitterfailin.blogspot.com
What's next? "Tis only a flesh wound"?
*epic megafail on Sarah Palin*
Pathetic.
Now make sure to hit up espn.com and how much she is going to help them
foxnews needs you
so does politico,cnn,msnbc,and twitter cya when you make your "Spam" rounds with the same post over and over again.
http://quitterfailin.blogspot.com
Translation "I was a proponent of her running for reelection until I watched her poll numbers dropping like a stone and realized she very well could lose."
http://www.thealaskastandard.com/?q=content/new...
She's still above 50% ... for now, but the trend lines are obvious even to an intellectual lightweight like Palin.
You've got to be kidding, right???
Who exactly is his credible opposition? The "gop leaders" in congress? (who are they again?) Newt? Mitt? Huckabee?
They can't even get a straight plan to voice a logical difference of opinion with what the Democrats are doing.
I voted GOP since Nixon, but after the party nominated bush (the lessor) as the best and brightest that we had, I said Never Again. I won't remind the readers how he lied us into a war, or how we were ATTACKED ON BUSH'S WATCH, or that bin laden is still out there, laughing at us.
In response to Obama's desire to change course, and start to solve some of our basic problems, such as energy, education and health care, what has my 'former' party done?
They've said "NO"
As in "No" from Palin (the quitter) or Mitch Mcconnell , or Bohner, or any other republican who could and should be able to come up with a reasonable, responsible counter argument to Obama.
Leaders they are not.
If you think one of these idiots can Lead this country better than Obama, you better put down the crack pipe, son.
Obama is the greatest president you ever see.....barring someone not yet visible....Sarah is one of the few that could top W for incompetence and stupidity....glad she is history.
Actually, as long as Huckabee is in the race Palin can't even get a plurality of the stupid vote....
http://quitterfailin.blogspot.com
If she had evidence that Obama was hanging out with terrorists, why the hell didn't she call the police/FBI? And now, she claims she wants to do a foot race with Obama, the "terrorist". How bad is that?!
She is a disgusting un-American woman who has earned to be criticized.
Oh wait. That wasn't her, was it?
Sarah needs to learn that big boys and girls don't pout and stomp their little feet then cut and run from the job they promised to do because people are picking on them. She made promises to the voters in Alaska when she ran for Governor and then took an oath to serve out her elected term as Governor. It was bad enough when she failed to show up to work with the legislature so much that Alaskan Republican Legislators were seen wearing "Where's Sarah?" buttons. BTW this AWOL act during the state budget cycle came after the presidential election had been over for months.
She is running out on the state because she cannot handle the pressure of the office of the governorship of a state with fewer than 700k people. Thank God we found out that she is a quitter before she got a really important job!
No serious person would have performed the kind of circus-clown performance she delivered in her duck-laden Quitter Speech. Good riddance!
If she runs she will most likely be announcing the creation of an exploratory committee in late 2010 or early 2011 and then go to New Hampshire and Iowa to raise money and get support. However the questions will be flying. Why did she resign for governor a year before she truly needed to and then a year later decide to run for governor was this her plan all along. She has been rumored to run for Governor and this resignation just makes those speculations intensify. I am beginning to think she is as dumb as she looked in 2008.
I interpret her passing the mantle as being self-serving: she knows that the next 18 months are going to show the destruction of everything she's taken credit for as Gov. But if she's not there when it fails, she can blame it on the new Gov: "I regret not having stayed on. I made an error in judgment in trusting that man to understand what needed to be done."
The scary possibility is that she'll spend the next 18 months cramming for the job she'd like to have. She's smart enough that she could show huge progress (any way she goes is up!).
But, nah. It's really the Peter Principle at work: at the top in Alaskan politics, she's realized that success on the national stage is beyond her - and that continued success in Alaska is also beyond her.